Log In | Register
"Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995"
The above is the headline from the London Daily Mail, for a story linked on Drudge (drudgereport.com) under the banner headline: "THE GREAT CLIMATE CHANGE RETREAT".
Yes, Phil Jones (former head of the "climate change" unit at East Anglia University in Britain, has finally come clean: admitting what I have been telling you for years. Jones was at the center of "climate gate": those emails suggesting that "global warming" scientists have been concealing and suppressing data which contradicts their "theory". This is significant because Jones and his unit were the basis for most of this supposed "consensus" on man-made "global warming". Jones' data was the basis of almost all of the "theory" of man-made "global warming", including the famous "hockey stick" graph of Michael Mann.
Jones has now admitted that the actual data does not support the "hockey stick" graph. He has further admitted that the present data suggests that the phenomenon of "global warming" may not be man-made. As the headline says, he has further admitted that the world is NO LONGER WARMING--after warming for only some 25 years.
Yet, a whole political movement has previously used Jones' data to suggest we should change our entire way of life based on the fraud of "climate change." This has to be the most SHAMEFUL moment in the history of science.
This confirms everything I--and others like me, including Michael Crichton--have been telling you. "Global warming" has never been about science, but about political agenda and a type of RELIGION being ised for political purposes.
The TEST of a real scientific "theory" is correct PREDICTION--not "consensus" or "peer reviewed articles". The "theory" of "global warming" has never been able to predict ANYTHING, and is really composed of a set of computer models that have consistently been proven wrong.
I am repeating below my previous article (one of many) on this subject, because it has been proven absolutely correct (as all of my articles on the subject have been):
Snow and Cold Are NOT "Warming": Global Warming Lies and Liars--the Fraud of Climate Change
Record snow in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and in Baltimore. My brother tells me Nashville has had the COLDEST winter since he moved there more than a decade ago. El Paso--where I live--has been pretty much normal, except for more rain, but I was counting on warmer. So much for "global warming", which should be discredited in every thinking person's mind by now. This is the fourth average (120 year average) to COLD winter in a row for the Unted States, and we are working on the 12th year in a row that the temperature of the world (average) will not have warmed.
What is the "theory" of "global warming"? Yes, we have to go back to basics here, to cut through the "f1984" style Big Lies of Gore and the rest. Nope. There is NO theory--not even a "global warming" style general hypothesis--that greenhouse gases affect the climate (for example, create storms or COLD--in any way other than warming the TEMPERATURE of the Earth. Nope. "Climate change" is NOT a "scientific term. It is a term of political advocacy. There is NO "global warming" "theory" (supported by evidence of a scientific kind) of how greenhouse gases affect the CLIMATE (beyond warming). There is not even any kind of rigours theory or hypothesis (beyond political and speculative assertion) as to how WARMING--which is no longer occurring--would affect climate. William Gray, the famous hurricane forecaster, has totally debunked the idea that "global warming" affects hurricanes, and there has never been any "theory" as to HOW "warming" (if it existed) and storms are related. Does it surprise you to know that is a FACT? Well it is.
But what about that "consensus" of scientists that "global warming" is a fact--beyond question (unscientific as that assertion is--showing that this is political advocacy rather than science). Forget that the "consensus" has been shown to rest on fraudulent manipulation and ignoring of data. --by "scientists" who have brought more SHAME on "science" than any people in history. There was--even still is--a politically inspired "consensus" that man-made "global warming" is significant. But this is slight of hand. It is like the DELIBERATE confusion of immigration and ill legal immigration--as if they are no different.
There has NEVER been a "consensus" that "global warming" affects climate in any particular ways--beyond making it warmer. There certainly have been no correct PREDICTIONS of climate. Of course, there have been no correct predictions of warming (specific ones), but there is not even a pretense of prediction climate. Yet, they changed the wording--"scientists" evidently going along with it--from "global warming" to "climate change". What can you say about any "scientists" who adopted this absurdity? What you can say is that they are not "scientists" at all, but POLITICAL HACKS.
What you have is a "consensus" (if fraudulent and false) "theory" (more an hypothesis based on subjective computer models) that greenhouse gases will have a warming effect on the Earth over a hundred years or so. Not very impressive, is it? Two foot rise in sea levels. No "consensus" on the melting of the polar ice caps. NO theory of violent storms and extreme weather. Just a "theory"/hypothesis that the temperature of the Earth will rise, which MIGHT have adverse effects on people--maybe 2 degrees over a hundred years. Even that "consensus" has failed to predict 10 years out--much less 100. But people are not impressed by that sort of thing--rightly suspecting that these "scientists" have no idea what will happen 100 years from now, any more than the ordinary person has. Among other things, an asteroid could hit the Earth. The SUN could FRY us (or FREEZE us). Several huge volcanoes could erupt, and send us into an Ice Age.
You see the sleight of hand, dont' you.? Sure you do. The "consensus" is pretty unimpressive--hardly that alarming. We could certainly afford to wait awhile and see where we are headed, rather than ruin our economy. For political advocates--behind the whole fraud in the first place--this is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. So the actual "tehory" is forgotten, except when it is trotted out (the "consensus" of "peer reviewed" science) in order to discredit the critics. Instead, the political advocates talk about the polar ice caps melting; about the seas rising 20 feet; about the extreme weather (always with us) increasing, and generally assert that Armageddon is right now. They LIE. They are deliberate, evil liars. They imply that the CONSENSUS is that all of those things are about to happen, and that is objectively a LIE. The "consensus" is that greenhouse gases will cause a gradual warming of the Earth. The SPECULATION--not science at all--is that all of these terrible consequences are right upon us. And it ALL depends on the Earth actually warming, which it has not done for 11 years (after warming for onlyl 28 years or so).
Thus, you see--like on MSNBC--"global warming" advocates asserting that the record snows in Philadelphia, D.C., and and Baltimore were "predicted" by the "theory" of "global warming". Nope. That is a LIE, and--those who are not dumb--know it. When I tell you that the weather in the United States has been average (120 year average) to COLD for more than 3 years (2007, 2008, 2009, and into 2010), they will tell you it is "weather" that they naturally can't predict exactly. But that did not keep them from saying the warm year of 2006 (only as warm as 1934, and the United Sates has COOLED since 1934) showed how close we were to doom, and that ski resorts would have to find some other business. Indeed, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote an article about how the lack of snow in the Virginia/D.C. area--where he said there used to be ski slopes--showed that we were warming to a time when snow would no longer even happen in the area (lol--what a FOOL
